![]() ![]() Someone needs to quietly erase something, and they need to sweep it up with a broad mop, so that no one notices the little smear that needed to go away. The reason these sorts of policies are upheld is to provide the umbrage of an imprecise broadsword, when conducting more surgical operations relating to espionage and counter operations. This motive alone guides organizations to hunt down and punish anything that would seem obvious to a lowest common denominator beureaucrat, when printed on paper. What’s actually transpiring is opportunistic enforcement, whenever there’s a broader perception of necessity to act against an apparently dispicable entity. There’s definitely no assured promise of correlation between transmission of content, possession of content, and true criminal act resulting in harm. ![]() That is far shakier legal ground than I would like to be on, especially for readers of this thread who would presumably be aware of the cache and where it has been hinted that the images may contain at best questionable content. > So, for example, in a "pop-up" case, it would have be to be proved that suspect knew that accessing a website would generate "pop-ups" and that those "pop-ups" would depict, or be likely to depict, indecent images of children The charge of 'making' widely interpreted to cover such activities as opening attachments to emails and downloading or simply viewing images on the internet. Subject to there being evidence of the act which constituted the making and the necessary mental element, an offence contrary to section 1 of the PCA 1978 is preferable and in most cases would suffice. > A person who views an image on a device which is then automatically cached onto its memory would not be in possession of that image unless it can be proved that he / she knew of the cache the person would also have "made" the image in question. That may be the case in the US, but FWIW it is not necessarily true across jurisdictions. It took me several attempts to get everything right and in the end the most difficult part of the puzzle was that the font I had used did not differentiate between a capital I ("eye)" and lowercase l ("el") well enough.Į: Here is the timer I was talking about and another page. I had to recreate the puzzle several times because I had to create the puzzle in reverse and test that the solutions would work. ![]() It also made me respect people who make complex puzzles. It was fun for the day and promptly ruined by the 4th or so solver who leaked the tripcode to ruin the little circlejerk that had formed over having solved the puzzle. I've done something similar for 4chan's /g/ board back in the day setting up a simple puzzle with the "prize" being a bruteforced tripcode that was to Serial Experiments Lain. It looks less ominous and more of a web-based puzzle to me. Could be related as a previous or future step of the same puzzle. In the bottom left of the dark web map there is another puzzle that says to "visit when the :imer (sic) runs out" with a countdown that is at like -2600 days or so. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |